HomeAppeal success ratesDart Charge (Dartford Crossing)

44.7%

of PCN appeals against Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) are won

The Traffic Penalty Tribunal recorded 101,024 outcomes for appeals against Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) from 2014/15 to 2024/25, and 45,166 of them ended with the driver paying nothing. That is 9.7 points below the 54.4% tribunal average.

This is a road charging scheme, not a council parking operation. The figures on this page cover the Dartford Crossing. The tribunal lists it as 'Dart Charge (Dartford-Thurrock River Crossing: Sec. of State for Transport)', because the charge is set by the Secretary of State for Transport and not by a council.

101,024appeals with an outcome
45,166won — nothing to pay
12,032refused

41,370 of those 45,166 wins were uncontested. In 91.6% of the appeals Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) lost, it put up no defence at the tribunal at all. That is the bulk of its losses, which tells you something plain: on most of the tickets that reach an adjudicator, the council would rather drop the case than argue it. Those tickets were not close calls. The authority had already given up on them, and the appeal was the only thing standing between the driver and a cancelled charge.

Is it getting easier or harder?

In 2014/15 to 2016/17, drivers won 55% of appeals against Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing), from 30,801 outcomes. In 2022/23 to 2024/25 it was 22.7%, from 31,185. Drivers are doing worse now than they were, by 32.3 points, so do not lean on the older figures.

Appealing a Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) ticket?

Build a properly worded appeal letter in a couple of minutes. Free, no account, and nothing you type leaves your browser.

Build my appeal letter

Year by year

YearAllowedNot contestedRefusedWon
2014/15 88 506 81 68%
2015/16 473 3,728 1,969 47%
2016/17 1,644 10,491 4,491 58%
2017/18 541 3,550 816 57%
2018/19 508 6,091 1,003 58%
2019/20 106 4,321 519 52%
2020/21 18 3,184 484 53%
2021/22 42 2,787 228 47%
2022/23 246 3,133 653 40%
2023/24 49 1,867 543 20%
2024/25 81 1,712 1,245 14%
All years3,79641,370 12,03244.7%

Busiest year: 2016/17, with 21,017 appeals decided. A further 43,826 appeals were closed by consent order across the period, which the tribunal counts separately because it can mean the driver agreeing to pay the original charge.

What this does and does not tell you

These are appeals that reached an independent adjudicator, which is the last stage. They leave out every ticket cancelled earlier, when you first challenge it or make formal representations, and that is where most successful challenges actually end. So your real chance of getting a ticket cancelled somewhere in the process is higher than 44.7%, not lower. Among the 203 authorities in England outside London and in Wales with enough appeals to compare, Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) ranks 169th for how often drivers win.

Two details worth knowing before you read too much into the number. The refused column includes appeals made after the deadline and appeals the driver withdrew, so it is not purely a record of arguments that lost on the evidence. And a small number of appeals each year finish with no outcome recorded against any of these categories, so the totals here are of appeals that reached a recorded outcome rather than of every appeal lodged.

Before you write

How similar authorities compare

Authority Appeals won
Winchester City Council 45.2% of 168
Denbighshire County Council 45.2% of 166
Warrington Borough Council 44.7% of 709
Dart Charge (Dartford Crossing) (this page) 44.7% of 101,024
Cambridgeshire County Council 44.6% of 662
Arun District Council 44.5% of 119
Carmarthenshire County Council 44.3% of 244

Every authority we hold figures for, with sources →

Source: Traffic Penalty Tribunal, appeals data by authority, covering 2013/14 to 2024/25. The tribunal decides appeals for England outside London and for Wales, across parking, bus lane, moving traffic, clean air zone, river crossing and littering penalties. Only dart charge penalties appear in its record. A tribunal outcome depends on the evidence in that particular case, so nothing here predicts yours.