HomeAppeal success ratesSefton Metropolitan Borough Council

25.7%

of PCN appeals against Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council are won

The Traffic Penalty Tribunal recorded 565 outcomes for appeals against Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council from 2013/14 to 2024/25, and 145 of them ended with the driver paying nothing. That is 28.7 points below the 54.4% tribunal average.

565appeals with an outcome
145won, nothing to pay
418refused

Over the same period Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council told the tribunal it issued 394,316 penalty charge notices. Only 565 of them ever reached an adjudicator, roughly one in 698. Almost everyone pays, which is worth knowing before you assume a ticket must be fair because so few people fight it.

What the tickets are worth. In its return to the government for 2024-25, Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council reported £572,000 of income from parking fines. That is 13% of everything it earned from parking, so most of its parking money comes from people paying to park rather than from penalties. Any surplus is not profit in the ordinary sense: on-street surpluses have to be spent on transport under section 55 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.

38 of those 145 wins were uncontested. In 26.2% of the appeals Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council lost, it put up no defence at the tribunal at all. That is a small share, so expect Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council to defend most cases and put your argument in front of an adjudicator rather than fold early. Those tickets were not close calls. The authority had already given up on them, and the appeal was the only thing standing between the driver and a cancelled charge.

Appealing a Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council ticket?

Build a properly worded appeal letter in a couple of minutes. Free, no account, and nothing you type leaves your browser.

Build my appeal letter

Year by year

YearAllowedNot contestedRefusedWon
2013/14 12 9 62 25%
2014/15 24 9 86 28%
2015/16 16 6 62 26%
2016/17 13 7 52 28%
2017/18 14 1 81 16%
2018/19 7 1 13 38%
2019/20 15 2 30 36%
2020/21 1 0 7 11%
2021/22 3 1 1 80%
2022/23 2 1 5 38%
2023/24 0 1 9 10%
2024/25 0 0 10 0%
All years10738 41825.7%

Busiest year: 2014/15, with 119 appeals decided. A further 2 appeals were closed by consent order across the period, which the tribunal counts separately because it can mean the driver agreeing to pay the original charge.

What this does and does not tell you

These are appeals that reached an independent adjudicator, which is the last stage. They leave out every ticket cancelled earlier, when you first challenge it or make formal representations, and that is where most successful challenges actually end. So your real chance of getting a ticket cancelled somewhere in the process is higher than 25.7%, not lower. Among the 203 authorities in England outside London and in Wales with enough appeals to compare, Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council ranks 202nd for how often drivers win.

Two details worth knowing before you read too much into the number. The refused column includes appeals made after the deadline and appeals the driver withdrew, so it is not purely a record of arguments that lost on the evidence. And a small number of appeals each year finish with no outcome recorded against any of these categories, so the totals here are of appeals that reached a recorded outcome rather than of every appeal lodged.

Before you write

How similar authorities compare

Authority Appeals won
Durham County Council 31.4% of 357
Portsmouth City Council 31.2% of 780
Torridge District Council 26.7% of 1,936
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (this page) 25.7% of 565
North Northamptonshire Council 24.6% of 142

Every authority we hold figures for, with sources →

Source: Traffic Penalty Tribunal, appeals data by authority, covering 2013/14 to 2024/25. The tribunal decides appeals for England outside London and for Wales, across parking, bus lane, moving traffic, clean air zone, river crossing and littering penalties. Only parking penalties appear in its record. A tribunal outcome depends on the evidence in that particular case, so nothing here predicts yours.